Spot on.
Our recent success masks the fact we were quite poor last year at extracting fair value for decent, hardened, AFL quality players.
Just because Carlton shows an interest in Butler, only looking at the picks that club currently has is lazy.
I repeat, the issue here is not what Butler is worth to Richmond, it's what he's worth to Carlton or any other suitor.
No more free hits for other clubs when it comes to obtaining players from Tigerland who will improve their list, thanks very much.
The only one where we really didn't get fair value for was Lloyd.
Miles and Ellis collectively gets us Gold Coasts 3rd which currently is Pick 37. I know we gave up our Pick but that was the other end so maybe around Pick 55. Personally Miles only has value as a stop gap for any team hence why his currency largely was non-existent. Whilst useful for a period of time you can pick guys like this as DFA, I believe we only got that trade because we threw Corey Ellis in who has either been injured or just doesn't have the physicality to really be a good AFL player.
Conca, we would have got a 2nd rounder but we got Lynch instead. Lynch for Conca is a big win.
That leaves us with Lloyd who IMO was the one out of the group that I would have kept, I was comfortable letting the others go. I believe the only reason we ended up with pick 64 was due to his age.
Butler is young (22) but he is also limited. I think people are setting themselves up for a big disappointment if you are expecting an early 2nd. I'm expecting an early 3rd personally, if we get Pick 34 (end of 2nd round) then we will have done well.
The other thing you ignore, is that we are in a 1 team market here (from what we are aware of) and frankly Butler IS NOT their primary target. They will wait and wait and if they don't get him its not a massive issue, hence I'm surprised at your comments about lazy trading when only looking at picks that clubs have. Carlton will not spend lots of time hunting for a few pick upgrades here and there in order to get Butler, they simply have bigger fish to fry. It will be a "take this pick or don't" scenario. If we don't then we need to offer Butler a contract or delist him which would be a ridiculous position to put ourselves in if we are currently looking at the 2020 list without him in it.
You make it all sound very simple but miss some massive inputs into negotiations. We don't have a commodity that the other party can not do without.