Well if you want to talk raw numbers, Graham, Nank, Pickett, Sonsie, were more horrible, and D Rioli and Short knocking on the door.
But, Shedda is the whipping boy de jour, so carry on.
Mate, go to the game and see for yourself. I'll hazard a guess he looks a lot better on screen.
Tonight he was very poor and it wasn't the raw numbers, you were just spruiking the numbers as some sort of validation. I haven't been on the bandwagon like everyone else as I've always known Shedda can pull a good game out of it, but it sure wasn't tonight. Sonsie had way more influence on the game than Edwards did tonight. Graham was down but influenced a lot more defensively. Nank was a statue and the worst player on the ground. Pickett was ok tonight, good defensively.
Shedda has never been a whipping boy for me so don't start throwing that old chestnut out there, there are some that have had him as the whipping boy for a long time, find a post before tonight where I have been bagging him before giving it to me for bagging his game out.
He was poor and along with Nank were the worst players on the ground for us. If you also read my posts I'm not necessarily bagging him for that, I'll say it again HE'S BEING ASKED TO PLAY A ROLE THAT HE CAN NO LONGER FULFIL.
But of course, go ahead and throw it back at me that I have him as my whipping boy. Aarts and Castagna are my whipping boys and rightfully so.