Your views are very black and white 123. Plenty of grey in the bring Rance back for the finals debate.
I'm arguing the risks of including Rance in this years final race will have on our chances to win it. It's higher risk than reward for me.The only genuine no risk option is for him to retire. We’re comparing risk percentages, not avoiding risk altogether.
I'm arguing that it will rattle the team. Maybe not as much, maybe in a different way, but it will have an effect. This time we won't have the luxury of a a long season to allows us to refocus and get back into gear.I’m arguing against the team getting rattled if he went down again. I think they’d cope perfectly fine, because they’ve already proven it.
We’d be losing a bonus weapon as opposed to losing a core, essential structural element. Big difference is psychology.
Aren’t you more bullish about the team’s ability to cope without him now compared to earlier in the year? Wouldn’t the team feel the same?
Individual, yeah, best handful. Would his inclusion into the team today make the team play better from day 1, no, I don't think so. May only take a week or two but finals footy is finals footy. You put your best team out there, not your best individuals. Probably one of the main reasons we lost the prelim last year.From a position of form / best 22, I’ll very confidently back Alex to prove he’s best 22 by the Grand Final. He’d be 6th/7th man.
I’m sure the new backline could learn to cope.