Disparate nomadic warring primitive tribes. They didn't have foundations.
Think you might wanna retract this one Lee.
Disparate nomadic warring primitive tribes. They didn't have foundations.
Will qualify it. Their foundations weren't sufficient to withstand the intrusion of the colonists.Think you might wanna retract this one Lee.
Will qualify it. Their foundations weren't sufficient to withstand the intrusion of the colonists.
Will qualify it. Their foundations weren't sufficient to withstand the intrusion of the colonists.
You make assumptions of what people mean because that is the only way your brain works and then get confused when it’s not right. Any sort of nuanced thinking seems to be beyond you.You're fine with observing Anzac Day and acknowledge that today's Australia would not be possible without that sacrifice, but you're not OK with Australia Day and recognising that today's Australia would not be possible without the struggle from wilderness. It's very hard to understand.
It's not wrong to be concerned at the level of anti-Australian sentiment being fostered and openly manifesting itself in this country.
You'll know fear when your Chinese mates move on Taiwan and Uncle Joe sits on his hands.
Disparate nomadic warring primitive tribes. They didn't have foundations.
Get your hand off it Lee.It needs to create something to be worthwhile. Special interest groups can't keep taking away.
So once again, put some effort into it and create something better.
Indigenous elder wants woke city mobs to “come and see what it is really like”
as a non Tele subscriber can you tell me who they are quoting?It needs to create something to be worthwhile. Special interest groups can't keep taking away.
So once again, put some effort into it and create something better.
Indigenous elder wants woke city mobs to “come and see what it is really like”
no one is denying Australia's history, many just dont think celebrating Australia, past and present, is best done on the day convicts first landed.It is a species of denialism to try to deny our origins to appease a section of the community. Our origins as a nation are as a British colony. That is a fact of history. Jan 26 as Australia Day acknowledges that fact.
We've come a long way from that convict camp of 232 years ago. We are a much richer and more inclusive society than we were. So in my view the heritage we received as a former British colony as well as what we have become should be celebrated. I'm with Turnbull change the Day when we become a republic.
Djevv there has been many posters describing the reason why changing the date of Australia Day would be good.It is a species of denialism to try to deny our origins to appease a section of the community. Our origins as a nation are as a British colony. That is a fact of history. Jan 26 as Australia Day acknowledges that fact.
We've come a long way from that convict camp of 232 years ago. We are a much richer and more inclusive society than we were. So in my view the heritage we received as a former British colony as well as what we have become should be celebrated. I'm with Turnbull change the Day when we become a republic.
because the only true argument those who want to keep the date is that they dont want those who want the date changed to "win". they cant just admit that so they have to try other arguments.Djevv there has been many posters describing the reason why changing the date of Australia Day would be good.
None of them have resorted to denying the past, or not acknowledging that our country was once a British colony. We have indeed come a long way.
No dispute.
So why claim that posters are denialists?
Why misrepresent the argument?
no one is denying Australia's history
I keep hearing that but Australia Day was always the 26th of Jan when I was growing up. The holiday to celebrate it was just moved to the nearest Monday to facilitate a long weekend.Yes, quite the opposite actually.
As has been stated before, Howard introduced the Jan 26th date so it's pretty recent in historical terms. And he did it as part of conservative identity politics.
I keep hearing that but Australia Day was always the 26th of Jan when I was growing up. The holiday to celebrate it was just moved to the nearest Monday to facilitate a long weekend.
Howard just took the automatic long weekend away.
There is a type of denial that tries to imagine that Australia was settled without any heavy handed tactics perpetrated by the colonisers. There is another where deniers wash their hands of the shame of being the descendants of colonisers by averting their eyes from what happened because it does not fit the modern narrative of inclusivity.Djevv there has been many posters describing the reason why changing the date of Australia Day would be good.
None of them have resorted to denying the past, or not acknowledging that our country was once a British colony. We have indeed come a long way.
No dispute.
So why claim that posters are denialists?
Why misrepresent the argument?
Perhaps can you re-familiarise me with the arguments that support moving Australia Day? I don't remember hearing any. Where would you move it to and why?because the only true argument those who want to keep the date is that they dont want those who want the date changed to "win". they cant just admit that so they have to try other arguments.
The proposal to change from Jan 26 isnt driven by denying that a British colony was started in 1788.There is a type of denial that tries to imagine that Australia was settled without any heavy handed tactics perpetrated by the colonisers. There is another where deniers wash their hands of the shame of being the descendants of colonisers by averting their eyes from what happened because it does not fit the modern narrative of inclusivity.
You have two days that are significant to how Australia came to be and don't commit either form of denial: Jan 1st or Jan 26th. Take your pick.
Australia was not settled by colonisers, it was already settled when they got hereThere is a type of denial that tries to imagine that Australia was settled without any heavy handed tactics perpetrated by the colonisers.
Hahaha.... now that is an excellent point!!! Well done sin, I don't think I've seen or heard that one before. So much for the early settlers claim. Outstanding!Australia was not settled by colonisers, it was already settled when they got here
Hahaha.... now that is an excellent point!!! Well done sin, I don't think I've seen or heard that one before. So much for the early settlers claim. Outstanding!