Declaration dated 30 July 2019 shows he had CSL shares thenHe declared CSL purchases in his register of members interests dated 30 June, he had none on his 30 March declaration. Proof is there if you look.
Declaration dated 30 July 2019 shows he had CSL shares thenHe declared CSL purchases in his register of members interests dated 30 June, he had none on his 30 March declaration. Proof is there if you look.
Check the documentation he's had CSL shares in his portfolio since July 2019. Proof is there, if you're willing to look.Already answered now we're just going around in circles.
Check the documentation he's had CSL shares in his portfolio since July 2019. Proof is there, if you're willing to look.
You specifically stated "He declared CSL purchases in his register of members interests dated 30 June, he had none on his 30 March declaration."Dunno why you want to keep going with this. I specifically acknowledged he may have had some CSL shares before he bought further shares in June.
You specifically stated "He declared CSL purchases in his register of members interests dated 30 June, he had none on his 30 March declaration."
None on his 30 March declaration?
So did he have none as you state or some as per his declaration?
If you're going to invent stuff to back up your conspiracy theories at least invent something that is at least close to the truth.
It's hardly surprising that an Australian should have shares in Australian company CSL.
I have shares in CSL.
Most people with a super fund probably do.
It is drawing a very long bow to suggest that, on the basis of that shareholding, they can influence the opinion of The Australasian Virology Society.
It's potentially a great leveller if no amount of money or importance can buy you a better vaccine. Maybe we can on-sell the AstraZeneca to a needier country and ensure everyone gets the same protection here.Someone made the point today, I'm happy to take whatever vaccine Scomo has taken.
It's potentially a great leveller if no amount of money or importance can buy you a better vaccine. Maybe we can on-sell the AstraZeneca to a needier country and ensure everyone gets the same protection here.
It’s the 10-14 day lag behind the spike in cases brought on by Xmas and New Year mixing. Cases are coming down now, so hopefully the deaths will fall in due course as well.1500+ dead in the UK in a single day. Keep the bastard out FFS.
deleted. dumb
Someone posted the analogy online would you use the condom that was 95% effective or 62% effective?
Meanwhile the US broke another single day record overnight of 4,327 deaths..
Pretty sure that's the plan.The higher efficacy vaccine should be being used on our most at risk groups IMO.
Has anyone seen anything that shows efficacy by age group?
Is there a cheese sandwich option?Someone posted the analogy online would you use the condom that was 95% effective or 62% effective?
Meanwhile the US broke another single day record overnight of 4,327 deaths..
Someone posted the analogy online would you use the condom that was 95% effective or 62% effective?
If i could use the 62% effective condom tonight or wait six months for the 92% effective one, I'd probably for the short term gratification
Thats what I was thinking but you phrased it betterIf i could use the 62% effective condom tonight or wait six months for the 92% effective one, I'd probably for the short term gratification