Damien Hardwick [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Damien Hardwick [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
lamb22 said:
To Rosy's question. No.

Must be interesting in the box with Dimma.

Supplicants: Dimma, their forward line is off the leash.

Dimma: mmmm...double down on grunt.

S: Dimma, they're triple teaming Jack and running the ball out too easy.

D: mmmm ....triple down on grunt.

S: Dimma...they are killing us outside.

D: mmmmm... quadruple down on grunt.

S: Dimma, our ball efficiency is down.

D: mmmmm......quintuple down on grunt.

S: Dimma..... our game plan has turned to treacle. We cant move the ball by hand or foot and we have no run whatsoever. We have too many grunts. What do we do?

D; mmmmm...

S Yes Dimma..

D mmmmmm.....

S: Yes, yes....

D: ..........well this may be a bit controversial and a bit left field......

S: yes...yes....

D: Why don't we chuck Griff in.

S: is that it?


D mmmmm........Oh and sextuple down on grunt!!
:hihi :hihi
 
mrposhman said:
I'm sorry you've lost me. There is part of an argument around better ball use in relation to Lennon, but Griffiths replaced him to try and stretch their talls and it worked in the first quarter as Dimma also mentioned, if Griffiths had kicked the 2 goals (as he should have) then it potentially could have been a different game.

The LLoyd / Conca one was because I think he wanted some additional midfield rotations. I'm less sure about what he was trying to achieve here and think Lloyd should have played but I'm not sure either really impacted too much on the result in the end. Conca did have his brainfade when we were looking to break and we were pretty open when he messed up that dinky kick but overall probably didn't impact the result.

The one area he really should have impacted the game was trying to get Cotchin into the game in a different way, he certainly should have been thrown forward to try and shake the tag as whatever Cotchin was doing wasn't enough to get rid of him, so IMO he should have been thrown forward as I think he would have had Jacobs in the air and could have impacted in the F50.

The other big one that people talk about was Jake Batchelors matchup and Grimes probably should have gone onto Waite but the real problem is the lack of flexibility that Batchelor provides us with, as he can only play on one type, too tall and he gets exposed, too quick and he gets exposed, too smart and he gets exposed. He wouldn't have coped with either Nahas or Thomas either so not sure of what we could have done.

Our real problem was our lack of flexibility which I think we've really tried to address in the off season. Our lack of flexibility has restricted our ability to mix things up on game day in the same way that we see the likes of Hawthorn playing. Batchelor has no flexibility and it will be interesting to see how we line up in the back half in 2016, will Yarran replace Batchrlor and take the smalls between him and Hunt with Grimes going to the 3rd tall player or does Yarran replace say Hunt. I hope the former. We've also relied on Cotchin too much as a ball extractor since Jacko and Tuck have retired, we've tried to address that with Townsend and Moore which is why I think at least one of them will be in the team from round 1, no idea which 1 is ahead at this stage, which should release this reliance on Cotchin and when he is tagged out of the game, someone else can support Miles with winning the contested ball, hopefully ending up in releasing Cotchin to be more damaging like his 2012 self.

So I kind of give Dimma some leeway on changing match ups as I don't think we have that right now, this is the difference between us being a good team that makes finals and us being a very good team that could challenge well into the finals. This is a timing thing in terms of our development from bottom rungers to where we are now and its the next stage in our development, adding flexibility and still being able to complete the game plan, instead of just being reliant on a handful of superstars to drag us over the line.

Posh apart from drafting more players the other way to develop flexibility is to coach it during the season with your existing players.

It is one area of weakness Hardwick has is his preference to maintain the statue quo, if players drop form maybe bringing in new players and back them for a couple of games so see what they bring would be a start.

This would bring a belief to the players who are pushing for a senior berth that they have a chance on their merit not just if injuries strike.

It also sends a message to the senior players that if you short step going for the ball or you don't want to chase that a stint in the two's is going to be a reality.

Next time we play North Bachelor should not be an automatic selection, instead both Elton and Astbury if their form is good should be the preference.

It is good to have a solid back six but if we are inflexible when it comes to our opponents forward set ups then this inflexibility works against us.
 
Tigers of Old said:
FWIW BG said on SEN this morning that they won't rush on Dimma's contract.


So it will probably be announced tomorrow. :spin

Mid-Feb is early enough I suppose. I've got my doubts on Dimma but there really isn't anyone else that stands out as any better at the moment.

I wouldn't be surprised they give him 2 year extension as that should finally see him out if we fail this season and 2017. We'll probably be back to a mini re-build by 2018 with some oldies (Lids? :o) ready to leave or be cut off, and younger ones of now ready to step up, all under a new coach.
 
Tigers of Old said:
FWIW BG said on SEN this morning that they won't rush on Dimma's contract.


So it will probably be announced tomorrow. :spin

Was a bit all around it really wasn't he, said "we had committees and meetings and processes to go through, that Damien didn't need the Club to rush it to give him motivation for the year, that he was very self-motivated", or words to that effect.

It is being discussed nearly every time some one in the media talks to a Richmond person (Board or other senior management). If it were imminent you would think BG would just throw some cold water about now and say something like '.....it will take care of itself, you might hear something in the next couple weeks or month I think.....' Perhaps it's not quite so unanimous as we might think at the moment?

Would he be that attractive to another AFL Club at the moment? Perhaps to a Club that had had it said to it 'this is my last year' (Freo or Hawks), but not winning a final after three shots at it probably is as big a worry to other Clubs as it is to ourselves. The Club might just keeps it's powder dry a bit longer yet.
 
Good news from Benny.

Half way mark of the season at the earliest for mine.

If as likely Hardwick triples down on grunt we will again blow winnable games early and if we are poorly placed at half way we just start the transition to a new coach and thank Dimma for the rabbits.

It will be heartbreaking though to blow another season with the list we've got. Absolute wastrel is our Dimma.
 
Tigerflag2008 said:
Club will again be in the spotlight if Dimma is unsigned and we have another bad start to the year.

:hihi Understatement of 2016 so far there Tigerflag
 
Tigerflag2008 said:
Club will again be in the spotlight if Dimma is unsigned and we have another bad start to the year.

You're right. They really should flick him now.
 
Geez you'd reckon he'd be nervous as all get out.

You got the media asking (at this stage) polite questions, you got the recruiting team picking guys that are kryptonite to him, you got a seriously under achieving list, and finally 70k members breathing down your neck.

A stolid guy is Dimma. I admire many qualities in the man, not so many in the coach.

He needs to release our skill, not contain it.

The NAB games won't tell us much in the way of tactics but at least we'll get to see who's in the frame for Round 1.

Pressure well and truly on.
 
Any contender bar Neeld would guarantee top 4.

Hirdy has some time on his hands.

Seriously though Dew, Knights, Bomber, Choco, Camporeale, Caracella. German and any number on the coaching certification list.
 
lamb22 said:
Any contender bar Neeld would guarantee top 4.

Hirdy has some time on his hands.

Seriously though Dew, Knights, Bomber, Choco, Camporeale, Caracella. German and any number on the coaching certification list.

Not a fan of Dimma Lamby?
 
lamb22 said:
Any contender bar Neeld would guarantee top 4.

Hirdy has some time on his hands.

Seriously though Dew, Knights, Bomber, Choco, Camporeale, Caracella. German and any number on the coaching certification list.

Tudor also.
 
Do you think Dimma's article where he says he'll keep doing the same thing and making the same mistakes even though it doesn't work has finally made the off field team sit up and take notice?
 
Like Carter, like the man and what he has brought to the club in terms of culture, honesty and competitiveness.

Too inflexible in his football tactics which is OK if you win but not OK if your tactics are not 100% right.
 
Carter said:
He needs to release our skill, not contain it.

The NAB games won't tell us much in the way of tactics but at least we'll get to see who's in the frame for Round 1.

Pressure well and truly on.

We agree at last.

Being a process coach (as Dimma admits to being) does not necessarily release skill, though perhaps it builds it over time. The problem then becomes which coach builds better process in the faster time. My problem is I'm not convinced ours is the better process because whenever we are expected to roll along - we don't. Sure we beat Hawthorn who undoubtedly has the best process (proven), but I would argue games like that were more won on ideal preparation and super-motivation than the usual process. We have done our best work in the season when all seemed lost or backs to the wall, and the process might well have been seen as less important and the release of skill that you talk about Carter was allowed to happen.

I've said before that I think Dimma is the antithesis of John Northey. Both have amazing qualities as coaches. But I think we need a little of the John Northey style right now, trust what process has been developed and start igniting the ultra passion and discover whether we can take some game games by the scruff, by what you define Carter as 'releasing the skills' and letting some players (not all) play a little more instinctively.
 
DLR said:
We agree at last.

Being a process coach (as Dimma admits to being) does not necessarily release skill, though perhaps it builds it over time. The problem then becomes which coach builds better process in the faster time. My problem is I'm not convinced ours is the better process because whenever we are expected to roll along - we don't. Sure we beat Hawthorn who undoubtedly has the best process (proven), but I would argue games like that were more won on ideal preparation and super-motivation than the usual process. We have done our best work in the season when all seemed lost or backs to the wall, and the process might well have been seen as less important and the release of skill that you talk about Carter was allowed to happen.

I've said before that I think Dimma is the antithesis of John Northey. Both have amazing qualities as coaches. But I think we need a little of the John Northey style right now, trust what process has been developed and start igniting the ultra passion and discover whether we can take some game games by the scruff, by what you define Carter as 'releasing the skills' and letting some players (not all) play a little more instinctively.

I agree completely about the 'process' not allowing us to get a run on.

Brilliant insight I reckon.

How often are we six goals up at half time but end up winning by a slim margin?

It's like we constantly return to a defensive base line, the structure that has been hammered into us.

Good for a mechanical 14-15 win season with a percentage that is just ok.

No smashings, no blow-outs, no capitalisation on good form.

Great insight DLR.
 
Quote from Ben Cousins in his book, My Life Story.
" Dimma set out his blueprint of how he wanted Richmond to play. For someone who had been around footy a long time, i was suprised at how different it was from anything i'd been part of...But now, team defence-techniques of how to cohere as a team when the opposition had the ball-was where the game was evolving...To his credit, he never wavered in his belief in what he was implementing, and the players bought into it."

6 years later and i still believe he hasn't wavered from that plan. Have we had long enough to see if it works? It worked for Hawthorn but perhaps we've missed the boat...
 
lamb22 said:
Any contender bar Neeld would guarantee top 4.

Hirdy has some time on his hands.

Seriously though Dew, Knights, Bomber, Choco, Camporeale, Caracella. German and any number on the coaching certification list.
WOW, that's a shallow and very uninspiring pool of candidates. If that's the best of the prospective coaches then give Dimma a two year extension and let's get on with it.

Get into Hodgies ear about joining our coaching team when his playing days are done, with a view to fast tracking into the senior job. He makes no secret of being a mad tiger supporter as a kid and still has a soft spot for us. Who knows he could turn out be our Kevin Sheedy.

If history serves as any sort of guide the Tigers approached Hardwick about taking the senior job 12 months prior to it becoming available so if Dimma tenure is in any sort of doubt his replacement would have been identified and approached already. If it is Dew then I hope catering isn't part of the deal :cutelaugh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.