tigertrue said:there's a fair chance overlooking Garlett while bite 17 clubs on the arse ...
TigerMasochist said:Sounds like a great idea, if only you could be certain of stealing a sack of diamonds and not a canister of toxic waste.
Bookies odds would not be good.
Baloo said:Better chance that the club that picks him will wish they didn't.
tigertrue said:Reason?
Incompetence?
Too lazy to do the hard work required?
mld said:Reckon the grenade might be better left in another club's hands.
mtench said:What would it cost us to pick him in the PSD, one years wage if he plays up? Could end up being a master stroke for the recruiting department basically having 2 top ten picks!
mtench said:What would it cost us to pick him in the PSD, one years wage if he plays up? Could end up being a master stroke for the recruiting department basically having 2 top ten picks!
I still recon we should take the risk and pick up a possible game breaker. We have picked up the safe bet (V man) now we could top of or reqruiting with a potential star! (yes could be a bust as well)Baloo said:Could also give Dusty a new play mate within the club now that we got rid of his other one.
Win win win
WesternTiger said:Anyone wonder why West Coast aren't interested in him?!
I think that says a lot.
tigerlandishome said:Whichever club takes Garlett, will have to draft his mother as well.