Who?? Liverpool or Bracks? :hihi :hihiLidsandBling said:the man is a disgrace
Who?? Liverpool or Bracks? :hihi :hihiLidsandBling said:the man is a disgrace
zips said:Who?? Liverpool or Bracks? :hihi :hihiLidsandBling said:the man is a disgrace
lefty said:zips said:Who?? Liverpool or Bracks? :hihi :hihiLidsandBling said:the man is a disgrace
it's obvious, really.
good on them there are tooooo many idiots on the road that put others at risk , the lowlifes that go off at me when i am obeying road rules makes me a bit angry at times i wish i was a cop so a can book themMichael said:Not really Lowlife of the week. More moron of the week
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/hoon-sang-like-a-canary/2007/02/20/1171733764512.html
Interesting to note the Police trolling car foums
No thats that bloody Hawks sticker on your car :hihithe golden said:good on them there are tooooo many idiots on the road that put others at risk , the lowlifes that go off at me when i am obeying road rules makes me a bit angry at times i wish i was a cop so a can book themMichael said:Not really Lowlife of the week. More moron of the week
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/hoon-sang-like-a-canary/2007/02/20/1171733764512.html
Interesting to note the Police trolling car foums
jb03 said:Geez, Livers, I think you'll get total support on this one.
rosy23 said:jb03 said:Geez, Livers, I think you'll get total support on this one.
I'm in. How boring. :hihi
Exactly right there NYT, but I'm sure that won't stop those activists.New York Tiger said:No point bleating on about one captive polar bear when the species may be extinct in the wild in 100 years.
nitrotiger said:My top 5 lowlifes...for this week .....
1.....Civil liberatrians and wowsers
rosy23 said:Don't twist my words to suit your purpose Livers. The thread wasn't removed because of the opinions posted as I said, it was the descriptive comments about sexual practices and it's pretty low to complain about about it.
Liverpool said:On the topic of 'wowsers'...there are some on this very forum too, when a topic was discussed, which could have easily degenerated into crude terminology and derogatory terms, yet was kept pretty 'clean' considering, and was debated without stooping to gutter words or the like......and because some people didn't like the actual opinions of certain posters, then the thread is removed, and the 'offended' posters leaving PRE.
Maybe that should mentioned on the 'soft' thread instead....?