Some posters may be watching it this weekend so I'll keep you waiting a bit yet.Waiting, is waiting for your critique ToO!!!!
Some posters may be watching it this weekend so I'll keep you waiting a bit yet.Waiting, is waiting for your critique ToO!!!!
I hope to be one of them.Some posters may be watching it this weekend so I'll keep you waiting a bit yet.
Pretty good flick. A real intense movie on Netflix is "Calibre" . Very well done.Some may have see it but watched a good English horror movie tonight from 2017 called The Ritual. Thought provoking & had a bit of imagination. Seek it out cause it’s worth the watch
Agree with all that mate. First half is tight as a drum & very entertaining. Then it starts to feel quite padded apart from a couple of good scenes. One movie would be better. Definitely better than Indy though.Saw MI7 on Sunday. Visually exciting with some interesting stunts but at a running time of 163 minutes it really did drag and run out of puff in the last half hour or so. And it’s only part 1!
Jamie Fox stole it.Anyone seen Collateral ? Not a bad movie. I'm not a huge Tom Cruise fan, but he's fairly good in this I have to say. So too is Jamie Foxx.
I haven’t seen IJ but I think I’ll wait til it hits the streaming services.Agree with all that mate. First half is tight as a drum & very entertaining. Then it starts to feel quite padded apart from a couple of good scenes. One movie would be better. Definitely better than Indy though.
Watched it ToO.Some posters may be watching it this weekend so I'll keep you waiting a bit yet.
Caught a movie called Citizen X on Fox. What a cracker. Great cast and performances. Was a made for tv movie from HBO from 1995 based on a true story of a Russian serial killer case. Worth a watch.
Good stuff waiting.Watched it ToO.
Good stuff waiting.
I'm glad a few have seen it before I commented.
I'll counter your view a bit.
I gave it 8/10. I enjoyed it but it was way too long & too dialogue heavy for me to call it a masterpiece.
The bomb scene was great but really found myself drifting off at times in the back half. I was honestly bored in places.
Sure the concepts were thought provoking but was like back to back to back school lessons in staffrooms & courtrooms.
Murphy's acting deserves an Oscar. Blunt & Harnett great but Damon & grated on me.
it's a good story but I hadn't realised it's not historically accurate (he never met Einstein) & I'm not all that keen on Nolan's editing style. Too jumpy.
like I said I liked it but feel it was overhyped (IMAX really?) & I could never sit through it again.
But hey it's only my opinion. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I always thought The Prestige was massively underrated.Interested to watch this but I'm really skeptical of Nolan as a director - his films are too long, characterisation and dialogue are poor and he's too reliant on flashbacks and clever plot loops. Sound design is also flashy, yet terrible and sometimes it's hard to make out the dialogue.
I loved Memento - which has its flaws - but I still think this was his best film.
That’s ok.Good stuff waiting.
I'm glad a few have seen it before I commented.
I'll counter your view a bit.
I gave it 8/10. I enjoyed it but it was way too long & too dialogue heavy for me to call it a masterpiece.
The bomb scene was great but really found myself drifting off at times in the back half. I was honestly bored in places.
Sure the concepts were thought provoking but was like back to back to back school lessons in staffrooms & courtrooms.
Murphy's acting deserves an Oscar. Blunt & Harnett great but Damon & grated on me.
it's a good story but I hadn't realised it's not historically accurate (he never met Einstein) & I'm not all that keen on Nolan's editing style. Too jumpy.
like I said I liked it but feel it was overhyped (IMAX really?) & I could never sit through it again.
But hey it's only my opinion. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I always thought The Prestige was massively underrated.
In the film, at least, the admiration goes both ways. Early on, Murphy’s Oppenheimer asks Conti’s Einstein to review a troubling set of calculations as the Manhattan Project gets underway. According to Edward Teller (Benny Safdie), setting off a nuclear explosion might cause a chain reaction that would ignite the atmosphere, destroying the Earth and everything on it. Einstein advises Oppenheimer to have another physicist, Hans Bethe (Gustaf Skarsgård), run the calculations again—revealing that while such an outcome is possible, it has a near-zero chance of actually happening. And near-zero winds up being good enough for them.
The scene, Nolan admits, is an invention. In reality, Oppenheimer did fear causing a chain reaction—but he sought counsel from Arthur Compton, a Nobel Prize winner who directed the Manhattan Project’s University of Chicago outpost, instead of the man behind the theory of relativity. “I shifted that to Einstein,” Nolan told The New York Times, because “Einstein is the personality people know in the audience.”
Thanks for the link waiting. Both these things above are presented in the film as if they actually happened & are pretty integral to the film but neither are true, just exaggerated for effect. I think that diminishes the movie a bit. It's loosely based on what happened but not a biopic. I guess Nolan thought it would be more entertaining.
Anyway as I said pretty good & we all see things differently.