MRP | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

MRP

Buddy has had the green light to belt little blokes his entire career.

As strange as it sounds,

this is one of the most consistent decisions the Tribunal has made in recent memory.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users
Buddy has had the green light to belt little blokes his entire career.

As strange as it sounds,

this is one of the most consistent decisions the Tribunal has made in recent memory.
Playing for Sydney doesn’t hurt, either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Swans play the bongs this weekend. AFL must of thought it was a danger game for Sydney.
 
Buddy has had the green light to belt little blokes his entire career.

As strange as it sounds,

this is one of the most consistent decisions the Tribunal has made in recent memory.
IIRC did he run through a young Shane Edwards and knock him out without suspension?
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Downgraded. $3000 fine and free to play

:rotfl1:rotfl1:rotfl1:rotfl1:rotfl1:rotfl1
Why am I not surprised
Been on Olympics ..came to check out verdict here.... Disgrace, he Freed his arm, cocked it and then unloaded. Three actions, deliberate, but reminds me of blokes like the underworld blokes you think try have a string of convictions but not guilty every time.
 
Ridiculous. Players are getting done for perfect tackles yet a clear gutless sniping act is deemed ok. I don't get it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
..... sick and tired of the 'favours' the supposed 'heroes' of the game get ...
 
There is one thing I would like to know. Now that SHocking has left the building, who is telling the “independent ” MRO & MRP who to charge and what to do?
 
Houli paid for the incompetency of Christian.

If Christian gave Houli 3 weeks instead of 2, then the footy public would have accepted it. But instead the secretary fiddler declared it manifestly inadequate (the first time in history that the AFL has appealed a tribunal verdict I believe) and gave Houli the extra 2 weeks.
Houli was sent straight to the tribunal, courtesy of the intentional rating. He fought the "intentional" grading but it was upheld immediately. The tribunal then decided on two weeks after hearing the character evidence.

Can't blame Christian for that one, they set him up for four weeks and the tribunal stuffed up.
 
So apparently because Buddy was “twisted” and off balance and that Ryan didn’t sustain an injury it didn’t necessitate a one game suspension, just a fine.

Good to know for future cases…..
 
So apparently because Buddy was “twisted” and off balance and that Ryan didn’t sustain an injury it didn’t necessitate a one game suspension, just a fine.

Good to know for future cases…..
Interesting isn’t it. No injury no suspension. Yet, how many times have our players been penalized for “ the potential to cause injury “
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 3 users
The mro gave him a week. It's the tribunal that's a joke. Who were sitting in the tribunal?