Now you are just making a fool of yourself.
Here's my post:
Please feel free to point out where I 'claim it was a behind'?
Please point out where I 'question people's assessment of the incident who have already stated they were there'?
Please point out where I 'claim the umpire was correct'?
I don't like humiliating posters but you can't just try and use me as a punching bag by making things up when you are frustrated with umpires.
I don't like to point out an inability to understand English but you seem to have trouble understanding what you yourself wrote.
You said "I think it's a point". Yeah, sorry, I call it a behind but I figured you could work that out for yourself, my bad.
Your whole post is all about questioning peoples' assessment of the incident, oh, except for the umpire of course.
You said "Goal Umpire standing on the spot" - what was that, a claim they could not be correct, or is it a claim that the umpire was there so correct? You can try and deny clearly obvious implied meaning but it won't wash with me.
If you want to see a fool, look in the mirror.
DS