TOT70 said:The Polak pick and the retention of Kelvin Moore on the list last year, were emotional choices. The club looked after two popular clubmen and, whilst the onfield return was poor, there may well have been other benefits. Carlton have done a similar thing with Sam Rowe this year, sometimes you just have to do the right thing.
I understand the sentiment, my only point with this is we could have looked after them without taking up a position on the list, give them a role within the club and then redraft them if all things come up rosy on the medical front. There would have been little chance another club would have snatched them from our clutches. Minor beef but that's just my 2 cents worth.
TOT70 said:At least with the older players, they get their opportunity and you know quickly if they can take it or not. Lonergan might play a number of games and be useful or he will be gone quickly, opening up a space for another player.
I certainly agree with this and it encapsulates the reasons why some rookie programs are more successful than others, that is keeping the conveyer belt chugging away and ensuring a steady turnover of players.
The distinction I make with guys like Lonergan versus unproven state leaguers is upside, the former has a clear talent ceiling whilst the latter has the potential to be more than just back-up. Are we just going to settle for a Brad Miller or are we aiming for the next Pods?