I didn't suggest they were similar, just that they were closer.1eyedtiger said:Our politicians are incompetent fools but comparing them with Antman's examples is a bit extreme.
I didn't suggest they were similar, just that they were closer.1eyedtiger said:Our politicians are incompetent fools but comparing them with Antman's examples is a bit extreme.
Giardiasis said:I didn't suggest they were similar, just that they were closer.
Brodders17 said:"Mr Shorten has, however, presented the nation with a legitimate choice. But we believe Mr Turnbull deserves the chance to deliver on the potential that stirred the nation when he came to power less than a year ago."
Basically they hope he can improve, and are willing to forgive him for doing nothing since he became PM. that seems the mantra for most who are voting for the Libs, that and 'stability'.
not many actually praising their policies.
Oh yeah? Point out the fallacious part.antman said:You are killing it with the sophistry today G-Man.
The silver lining of the ALP inevitably losing today is it brings Andrews' transition to federal politics a step closer. Maybe the ALP itself will make a comeback, after going missing for 20 years post-PJK.Ian4 said:Yep, and thats the fault in the argument. Look at Daniel Andrews... he hit the ground running from day 1 after 4 years of nothingness from the previous govt. Now 3 years of nothingness except incompetence from this government and people think they deserve more time? *smile* to that.
Edit: 55000 full time jobs lost in the past 4 months with the auto industry jobs about to fall off the cliff.
#JobsAndGrowth
Give Shorten a round peg and a round hole and his wife will still say, "Ah no, Bill. Not there."mrposhman said:Bill Shorten is not likeable and apparently has no idea how to eat at a sausage sizzle. How can he run Australia when he cannot do the basic Australian things correctly. Does he drink a beer with a straw? :hihi :hihi :hihi
In all seriousness has anyone ever seen someone eat a sausage sanga like that before?
Neither side is strong but Shorten is coming from behind and has absolutely zero charisma to try and win votes. He was done before he became leader of the labor party.
Giardiasis said:Oh yeah? Point out the fallacious part.
What is the point in voting for representation when the only options are psychopathic control freaks
TigerForce said:Quite obvious that Shorten can't win. Today is just a formality for Turnbull to be officially voted in as PM. Nothing will happen.
Yep, I can't see the Reds winning 19 seats.antman said:Is that a reverse BigScooty jinx attempt TF?
True, odds are at least one of them isn't. The vast majority though want to exercise control over other people's lives, that's why they aren't doing something else, like for example a productive job. What kind of person would prefer the former over the later?antman said:This bit for one:
LIKEIan4 said:Yep, and thats the fault in the argument. Look at Daniel Andrews... he hit the ground running from day 1 after 4 years of nothingness from the previous govt. Now 3 years of nothingness except incompetence from this government and people think they deserve more time? *smile* to that.
Edit: 55000 full time jobs lost in the past 4 months with the auto industry jobs about to fall off the cliff.
#JobsAndGrowth