Not going to read something from the Mises mob, was it not Mises who wrote:
He also claimed that fascism has won merit for itself.
Enough on that tangent though.
Fascism has always been a bit difficult to pin down, there being no overarching theory and examples with many differences. The most obvious examples would be Hitler, Mussolini and Franco.
There are a few features which fascist regimes share:
Trump and his mates exhibited some of these tendencies in various ways but it would be a very large stretch to call Trump fascist.
DS
It cannot be denied that fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilisation.
He also claimed that fascism has won merit for itself.
Enough on that tangent though.
Fascism has always been a bit difficult to pin down, there being no overarching theory and examples with many differences. The most obvious examples would be Hitler, Mussolini and Franco.
There are a few features which fascist regimes share:
- They are very nationalistic, and generally racist in support.
- A strong leader is a feature.
- They suppress any opposition.
- Undermine any opposing opinions even to the extent of denying reality, this is generally a first step followed by just banning opposing opinions.
Trump and his mates exhibited some of these tendencies in various ways but it would be a very large stretch to call Trump fascist.
DS