Just on judges, why the f don't the Dems increase the Supreme Court bench (they can) to mitigate some of the democratic vandalism the Republicans wrought by stacking it with hard right morons like Kegger Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Under His Eye Barrett? You can't play nice with cheats.
It is a judgement call, but I figure the Dems would be thinking that if they expand the bench then the Republicans will do the same when they get the chance. Plus, there is no certainty they could get their choices for the Supreme Court bench through the Senate where you need, I think, 60 votes to confirm a judge.
The Dems need to play harder. They were denied a Supreme Court judge when Obama was Pres on the grounds it was an election year (early in an election year) and the next Pres should choose, yet the next Pres got to choose one within a couple of months of the election. The Republicans quite a while ago decided to just rort the rules any way they can to get their way and the Dems need to get more ruthless.
On a side note, the Dems need to do something about getting control of more state legislatures. They might have to try and pick them off one by one but the gerrymandering and voter suppression is out of control in so many states, and states have a lot of power in the USA. The place is in a real mess because one of their major parties has decided to just screw up the system any way they can. It won't end well.
If Trump ends up up of the race or out of contention for the Republican nomination then De Santis will probably get the gig. He is certifiable: bans books, rewrites history, all sorts of craziness. Make no mistake De Santis is probably more dangerous than Trump, Trump is an incompetent nacissistic buffoon, De Santis is way more competent and will do more damage if given the chance.
DS