Houlis is a good comparable case. Except Houli broke a jaw, and the AFL fixates on the result not the action.Punch to the head behind play with force, player stayed down.
Why aren’t people demanding 4+ weeks? The media’s 1 week’s vs nothing narrative is so stupid.
Remember Houli getting 4 weeks in 2017 because of backlash at him originally getting 2 weeks? Hawkins’ punch is worse.
I did not see the incident, but we all know there is one rule for some clubs and another for others, particularly the Tigers.
Still to this day I smart over the suspension handed out to Houli.
Threw his arm back, was suspended for 4 weeks for God's sake and then the AFL, in an unheard of decision gave him another 2 weeks.
So, will Hawkins get off after whacking a player in the noggin?? Will wait and see.
Because we know the system.Punch to the head behind play with force, player stayed down.
Why aren’t people demanding 4+ weeks? The media’s 1 week’s vs nothing narrative is so stupid.
Remember Houli getting 4 weeks in 2017 because of backlash at him originally getting 2 weeks? Hawkins’ punch is worse.
On previous cases this year The Tommyhawk must get a week for biffing a bloke to the head off the ball. Pretty sure he's got a couple of priors for whacking blokes so perhaps that should be another week as well.
Would not surprise me in the slightest that he gets off n plays next week, simply because he's got such a nice cheerful smile n he musta felt guilty about whacking Schofield 'coz he did apologise, ask him if he was o.k. n offered to call for the medicos for him.
Lucky it wasn't a swinging ball bag, that'd have to be a month.It looked like a swinging handbag, he should get a week.
Lucky it wasn't a swinging ball bag, that'd have to be a month.
This... hawkins needs to cope the week or even 2.... but ffs that toby greene should of coped 2 as wellAs a catman i say a week. My gripe is Green should have got 4. Its the MRP and its looney tunes decisions that rile me. All manipuated for the FL
Houlis is a good comparable case. Except Houli broke a jaw, and the AFL fixates on the result not the action.
If that’s the case then Stewart should get a week from Christian. He won’t because he doesn’t play for the RFC but I do see the Cotchin and Stewart incidents as similar. I personal don’t think he should.Ralph was saying tonight that for that incident Michael Christian wanted Cotchin cited but the other two panelists voted against. I don't remember that but that week and the one after are a bit of a blur.
Stewart didn't get him in head so no case to answerIf that’s the case then Stewart should get a week from Christian. He won’t because he doesn’t play for the RFC but I do see the Cotchin and Stewart incidents as similar. I personal don’t think he should.
Let's see how hard Geelong supporter, Gerrard Whatley, goes on crunch time this morning on SEN. He has been belligerent on outing players all year so if he goes soft now the conflict of interest will be as big as that ENORMOUS nose on his face