I just don’t see how they can argue the conduct grading. It can’t be careless because there was no reason for him to be swinging his arm in that manner. If the ball is there then yes but not in that situation. And I’m not sure it matters if he didn’t meant to hit the head, he did mean to hit him and it did end up being to the head. I also believe there is a small risk that the tribunal can reclassify the contact grading to medium however it’s unlikely. Would be funny if he did end up with two though.Go to page 6 of this link if you want to see the different gradings for a classifiable offence.
https://s.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/2019-Tribunal-Guidelines.pdf
How this was graded low impact is beyond me and it does leave a chance for Hawkins to only receive a fine if it is downgraded from intentional to careless.
They will probably argue Hawkins went to whack him in the arm but because Schofield was bent over Hawkins hit him in the head.
Going by the grading system Christian definitely should have graded it intentional and medium impact which was high (to the head) - A clear 2 weeks.