Nomorewaiting said:
Penalties ( in my eyes ) is a harsh way to sort out an outcome of games.
What are peoples thoughts ?
1. Keep playing after extra time until goal is scored ( golden goal )?
2. Take a player off after extra time every x mins until a goal is scored ?
They've tried golden and silver goals before and it became a farce.
In the 1996 euros, every game that went to extra time was basically a massive snore fest as both teams sat back and didn't want to be opened up defensively. The one game that didn't have that was England vs Germany in the semis where it was end to end. England in particular didn't want to go to penalties but no goals were scored in extra time (despite numerous excellent chances, the best to Gazza who had he not hesitated, or he had slightly longer studs, would have scored and England would have won), no goals were scored and history shows we were knocked out on penalties with Southgate missing the final penalty for England and I think Mueller winning the game for Germany.
I actually didn't mind the idea of running penalties, where you get the ball on the halfway line, you have a set time to take the ball into the box and try and score, keeper can come off the line etc.
As a pom, I'm naturally against penalties as generally we aren't very good at them, but its hard to find an alternative really.