Who we are selecting with our first pick? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Who we are selecting with our first pick?

Good question

I liked our strategy tonight. We’ll load up next year in a more certain draft environment after a few retirements
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I can't help but feel a sense of let down. We had to wait about an hour and a half into the draft, eagerly awaiting to find out who our first pick (and future RFC star) would be, only to have the big disappointment of hearing that our club would not be using our first pick at all but instead would trade it to our arch enemy, Geelong. I just don't like giving Geelong a leg up for any reason. Unfortunately they will likely be in the finals again next year. Then we only drafted two players when, apparently, we could have taken four players. We now have 41 players on the list (including Houli), when we could have a maximum of 44 players. Perhaps we could have afforded to keep Turner or Eggmolese-Smith on the list. The club may draft another rookie and/or draft another player in the pre-season draft or mid-season draft but I think that it will be very disappointing if the club doesn't end up having the maximum number of players on the list.
 
Kids we had listed as a potential first pick were all taken. Thought it was a smart move.
No real stand outs when it was our turn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I can't help but feel a sense of let down. We had to wait about an hour and a half into the draft, eagerly awaiting to find out who our first pick (and future RFC star) would be, only to have the big disappointment of hearing that our club would not be using our first pick at all but instead would trade it to our arch enemy, Geelong. I just don't like giving Geelong a leg up for any reason. Unfortunately they will likely be in the finals again next year. Then we only drafted two players when, apparently, we could have taken four players. We now have 41 players on the list (including Houli), when we could have a maximum of 44 players. Perhaps we could have afforded to keep Turner or Eggmolese-Smith on the list. The club may draft another rookie and/or draft another player in the pre-season draft or mid-season draft but I think that it will be very disappointing if the club doesn't end up having the maximum number of players on the list.

Reduced crowds still expected for 2021. Income reduced so have to manage budget better. Salary cap less.

Thinking we may run a couple down for 2021 to help cover the on going COVID financial impacts.

I don't think this is a problem for us given we have the players ready to step up. We will have 38 of our current 41 players potentially ready to play the top grade. Time to find out if they are any good.

6 picks in first 3 rounds next year will make for a mini rebuild in a draft that will have left over players from this year (with another full year of development) plus the normal amount of kids.

Good strategy
 
Who are we selecting as our first pick.....drumroll...

GEELONG!

Really? That's what we get for pick 17 and part compensation for Jack? Honestly, I'm severely underwhelmed and doing any deal which Geelong would agree to just feels wrong.

Threads dead Zip. Threads dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Kids we had listed as a potential first pick were all taken. Thought it was a smart move.
No real stand outs when it was our turn.
As usual, with every draft, time will tell which players will go on to have long and successful AFL careers and which clubs were successful in the draft. Time will tell if it was a "smart move". Perhaps we have missed out on a potentially really good player between picks 20 and 39. For example, Reef McInnes (193cm defender/midfielder) at pick 23. "Shifter", David King and Brad Johnson were praising him big time in the tv coverage and saying what a great choice he was by Collingwood. The Age stated today "was touted to go higher. Magpies will be happy to have got him here". Time will tell. If he goes on to play 250 games for Collingwood, then maybe it wasn't such a "smart move".
 
Reduced crowds still expected for 2021. Income reduced so have to manage budget better. Salary cap less.

Thinking we may run a couple down for 2021 to help cover the on going COVID financial impacts.

I don't think this is a problem for us given we have the players ready to step up. We will have 38 of our current 41 players potentially ready to play the top grade. Time to find out if they are any good.

6 picks in first 3 rounds next year will make for a mini rebuild in a draft that will have left over players from this year (with another full year of development) plus the normal amount of kids.

Good strategy
There is another possible angle to all this and that is the absence of a new contract for Houli. Maybe it is taking so long because there is a disagreement between player and club as to the amount on a new contract. Maybe the club didn't take another player in the draft because they wanted to leave some salary cap "buffer" to possibly accommodate some extra money for Houli. I can't imagine Houli making any over the top money demand but after all, he is a three time premiership hero and has probably been paid "unders" by the club for the last 3-4 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
As usual, with every draft, time will tell which players will go on to have long and successful AFL careers and which clubs were successful in the draft. Time will tell if it was a "smart move". Perhaps we have missed out on a potentially really good player between picks 20 and 39. For example, Reef McInnes (193cm defender/midfielder) at pick 23. "Shifter", David King and Brad Johnson were praising him big time in the tv coverage and saying what a great choice he was by Collingwood. The Age stated today "was touted to go higher. Magpies will be happy to have got him here". Time will tell. If he goes on to play 250 games for Collingwood, then maybe it wasn't such a "smart move".
David King and Brad Johnson rated him?
Guaranteed to be a *smile* player.
Those two couldn’t pick a winner in a one horse race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
David King and Brad Johnson rated him?
Guaranteed to be a *smile* player.
Those two couldn’t pick a winner in a one horse race.
I saw King at Flemington one day. He backed the favourite in the 2nd. It came in first in the 3rd. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
David King and Brad Johnson rated him?
Guaranteed to be a *smile* player.
Those two couldn’t pick a winner in a one horse race.
You know perfectly well that drafting can be particularly hit and miss. In the end it doesn't matter what King or Johnson think, time will reveal the success or failure of drafting choices. A few years ago, the RFC drafted Shai Bolton at pick 29. If the 18 clubs knew at the time of the draft what we now know about how very good Bolton is, he would surely have been drafted in the top 5 picks. Obviously there are many many examples of good and bad recruiting over the years by all clubs. As I mentioned, I was very disappointed that the club didn't back itself and take a judgment chance on a player using our first pick (and trading that pick to the foe at Geelong just made it worse) . I am of course not privy to the internal/private discussions and deliberations of the RFC recruiting team and neither are you. Imo, it is premature to say with any confidence that the RFC not using our first pick was a "smart move". We can watch with keen interest next season as to how the players picked at 20-39 and 41-50 fare at their respective clubs.
 
You know perfectly well that drafting can be particularly hit and miss. In the end it doesn't matter what King or Johnson think, time will reveal the success or failure of drafting choices. A few years ago, the RFC drafted Shai Bolton at pick 29. If the 18 clubs knew at the time of the draft what we now know about how very good Bolton is, he would surely have been drafted in the top 5 picks. Obviously there are many many examples of good and bad recruiting over the years by all clubs. As I mentioned, I was very disappointed that the club didn't back itself and take a judgment chance on a player using our first pick (and trading that pick to the foe at Geelong just made it worse) . I am of course not privy to the internal/private discussions and deliberations of the RFC recruiting team and neither are you. Imo, it is premature to say with any confidence that the RFC not using our first pick was a "smart move". We can watch with keen interest next season as to how the players picked at 20-39 and 41-50 fare at their respective clubs.
Bolton would go close to number 1.
The kid is unbelievable
 
All Collingwoods did last night is try to put out the fire coming from the mob.
They haven't got a clue who they picked up.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
All Collingwoods did last night is try to put out the fire coming from the mob.
They haven't got a clue who they picked up.
Some reckon they smashed it outta the park........................................(god I hope not).

May they have a 2004 Draft Haul as the RFC did.
 
But he marks the ball at the highest point according to David W King
This is the new phrase in footy this week, never before have I heard so many pundits pull this one out.

One person in the know says something and then they are all over it like a fat kid on a cupcake.

King is becoming a Parody of Himself, has he declared the Maggots or Drugs as top 4 contenders after slamming the draft yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Impressive since the highest point of the ball on an arc could be 20 or 30 metres up
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user