If it was just a matter of a bloke getting a live call wrong, or even getting a video call wrong, I could move on as well as anyone.If the central umpire is not to sure he will put his hands behind his back and says to the goal umpire all clear, indicating that the goal umpire has the call.
The goal umpire was half a metre away from the goal post and as so had the best position of any one to make the judgment call this includes the numpties up in ARC.
They stuffed up but we just have to move on otherwise we just become salty.
How anyone can say that that video was the 100% conclusive evidence needed to OVERTURN the umpire's call is beyond reasonable error.
It doesn't matter whether it was a goal or not ... but the fact that it probably was AND the goal umpire got it right, just makes it worse.
I think it was something more that just stuffing up.