Melbourne looking to trade into GWS’s first pick tonight (22).
Barnett ?
Is Barnett THAT good? You'd assume they will need to trade 1 of their 2 1sts for next year for that pick, either their own or Freo's.
Melbourne looking to trade into GWS’s first pick tonight (22).
Barnett ?
Why?GWS had to match. Their whole academy system falls over if they don’t.
Why would we want Hartley replaced?Beatson is the best around. We should be in his ear to replace Hartley. We need the experience with Balmey on the way out.
Because players and parents lose faith in the system. If GWS aren’t committed to draft me why would I join their academy.Why?
We don’t want him replaced but if he leaves we should be after the best going aroundWhy would we want Hartley replaced?
Or the mums keep pushing out daughtersTends to be hard to claim Father/Sons when the father only played 8 games.
With Grundy in the bag I don't think it will be Barnett, Cowan makes sense with Hibberd close to the end.Is Barnett THAT good? You'd assume they will need to trade 1 of their 2 1sts for next year for that pick, either their own or Freo's.
We routinely raid Brisbane's academy and its still standing.Because players and parents lose faith in the system. If GWS aren’t committed to draft me why would I join their academy.
They’ll go and play rugby with their mates instead.
Soccer, League and Union are the dominate school and local sports in Sydney. AFL is practically invisible
Was it Fred trueman that said tufnell should be a clown in the circus, not fielding for EnglandIt was a very gutsy move. GWS could easily have not matched. AS Nigel Tuffnell said, there's a fine line between genius and stupidity.
Not for their top talent we don’t and only when they don’t have the points to pay up.We routinely raid Brisbane's academy and its still standing.
He's a safe bet IMO. Can't see him failing. At absolute worst he'll be a very good back up, journeyman ruckman.Is Barnett THAT good? You'd assume they will need to trade 1 of their 2 1sts for next year for that pick, either their own or Freo's.
I wouldn't have HR in top talent bracket myself. But anyway, I disagree. There are a lot of mitigating factors.Not for their top talent we don’t and only when they don’t have the points to pay up.
I wanted a 7yr dealI reckon if we dug back into the archives there would be a post somewhere from you calling him a midget and a dud and demanding he be delisted.
Ok whether its Barnett or Cowan, are they really worth trading a future 1st round selection?With Grundy in the bag I don't think it will be Barnett, Cowan makes sense with Hibberd close to the end.
Worked well but not without its risks. Whenever you shaft a club the risk is that one day the boot will be on the other foot.Yes, that was impressive by Sydney.
Thinking about it, being the first pick of the 2nd round, GWS are unlikely to use that on a bid for Davey. Probably up to the Eagles and Dogs. And even they’re unlikely I reckon. We’d need an NGA bid between 41 and 47 to move up further I think. Bit doubtful.
48 looks about as good as it’s gonna get, maybe.
Nigel Tufnell was the lead guitarist for Spinal Tap. You’re thinking Phil!!Was it Fred trueman that said tufnell should be a clown in the circus, not fielding for England
It was payback for the Crows.Worked well but not without its risks. Whenever you shaft a club the risk is that one day the boot will be on the other foot.
RFC works on reputation.
Not sure which is best but today’s genius could be tomorrow’s disaster
This idea of yours that anything short of nailing every draft pick is a failure is bizarre. There isn't much point having a discussion.Cumberland turns out to be very promising and Martyn another wasted pick. Classic Clarke drafting.