As has been mentioned, his article is full of his opinions, mostly unproveable.
And yes we know your perfect world has no government, or central planning or taxes, only individuals and firms looking after their interests. we know in your perfect world health care and education would only be available to those than can afford it, or to those who are lucky enough to benefit from charity. we know privately operated courts and security firms would be available to those that can afford them, (I'm still not sure who appoints the courts though), and that the only 'crimes' are those that harm another's private property rights, and the only crimes that are investigated are those that are committed against those who can afford to hire investigators.
Thankfully we will never live in your perfect world. (apologies to those that aren't interested.)
Oh but Gia likes the theorist Hoppe, not exactly no government, certainly not no hierarchy and definitely comes with coercive powers.
Hoppe's problem with monarchies is not that they set themselves up as an elite (that's fine) or even as an hereditary elite. The problem is that they want to be a monopolistic elite. As long as you get a choice of oppressor that's fine. I suppose still fine if the choice is an oligopoly of oppressors, just the monopoly of oppression is an issue. As for the courts, you go and hire the legal system on the free market - yeah right that's going to work.
Neo-liberalism is an abject failure in this crisis, as evidenced by the Atlantic article above. In fact, it is the weakening of communities over recent decades, and the promotion of selfish individualism which has made the current situation harder to deal with. Can you imagine if everyone acted selfishly, as promoted by so-called libertarians, when we were at war? It would have been a disaster.
The reality of the social distancing measures being implemented is that the vast majority of people are not abiding by these restrictions because they might get caught and fined. We are not minimising our movements outside our houses because we might be breaking the law. We do this because we have seen the evidence, listened to the arguments about the spread of this virus, and we act to protect ourselves and our communities.
DS