Ok
Schacht Konrad: disused mine proposed to be used for low level waste. Studies on using this mine for waste started in 1975, yet still not being used, so it has taken 45 years so far. Impressively quick I must say.
Mizunami Gansu: still being built. We'll see if this is geologically stable over 10s of thousands of years in a geologically active zone.
Oskarshamn: low level waste is being stored in Sweden and Oskashamn is one of 2 locations which are potential candidates for high level waste.
Not seeing any current or past facilities for the long term safe storage of high level nuclear waste which is toxic for 10s of thousands of years.
Nuclear has had 70 years to solve this, it has not done so.
Nuclear ain't ready.
Deal with it.
DS
Lee failed to do his own research.
And all this, even if effective, adds massive costs to the whole of lifecycle analysis. Nuclear fusion reactors are still a possibility I guess - no nuclear waste. But still seems hard to get the engineering happening.