Bollocks. Age mid next year? So when they've nearly played another full season?
These guys have at least a couple of years in them of footy left in them:
Martin 30
Grimes 30
Astbury 30
Lambert 29
Pickett 29
Caddy 29
Lynch 28
Prestia 28
Broad 28
Mcintosh 27
Vlastuin 27
Nankervis 26
Yes, we need to build. For sure. We have a few good pick this year to kick things off. Pinch a free agent or two and we're right back in it next year.
But having Nick and Toby in your retiree list is rich, they're barely in the second half of their careers. And there some great talent in the bottom half of the age list (and some players who need to go, but that's true of every list, every year). Things need to turn over but done well from here, it's entirely possible to stay near the top.
I wasn't at all suggesting the players at the lower end of the list would retire.
It was indicative of the ageing list.
The age marker for mid next year - was to highlight the extreme age of our core senior group. Not too many successful lists or any lists for that matter - have the majority of their leadership group that old - 31/32 plus. let alone 33+.
Many of those players you've listed are now starting to be hit by injuries(especially soft tissue) and out for considerable periods. Something that comes naturally when you hit 29+. Week to week propositions in fact.
Also there's every indication their best form is behind them - Again something that is natural for the 29+ Age band.
With those 2 last points - You're starting to see that in the dramatic fall off/inconsistency in our form. Players out at times. Yes. But that just highlights my previous point.
If you're expecting the same output from those players next year - from that of the 3 flags - you're dreamin'
Plus taking the presence(not form) of Cotchin/Riewoldt/Edwards out the team is immeasurable.
With Astbury on the verge of retirement - If Grimes goes down next year - Who are you going to call on.