He never made much sense and isn't making much sense. He says he confronted the group about the nickname midway through his three years under Buckley, June 2013, and use of the nickname immediately ceased. He does however mention subsequent "problematic occurrences" without any detail.
I've got no doubt he was on the outer following his TV appearance which poured petrol on McGuire when he was already under the pump for the King Kong thing. Harry just had to have his share of the limelight. If you choose to poke the bear, you need to be sure he's going to remain caged!
I've also got no doubt Harry said or did some things over ten years at the club that could be used against him (e.g. his drug use which he pre-emptively mentioned in order to make it Collingwood's fault). I don't think Collingwood wants to do it to him and is sitting on its hands, under duress.
Last edited:
