Giardiasis said:
Damn straight that wasn't clear! Both your positives were anti-Clinton. Without your qualifying adendum it would be easy to assume that, were you a Merkin, you'd be voting for The Human Merkin, Trump.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
U.S Presidential Election
- Thread starter Chiang Mai Tiger
- Start date
Damn straight that wasn't clear! Both your positives were anti-Clinton. Without your qualifying adendum it would be easy to assume that, were you a Merkin, you'd be voting for The Human Merkin, Trump.
Merkin muffley is on the right track, but he still goes for merchantalist and interventionalist nonsense, torture, and war in the Middle East. He ain't libertarian.KnightersRevenge said:
Giardiasis said:
Ummm...no. He is Clive Palmer. He talks fast and hopes no one questions the nonsense. His "business acumen" is mostly rat cunning (often mistaken for non-conventional intelligence, it isn't. ) mixed with height, profile, daddy's money and brass balls. High fallooting talk like the above misses the mark completely. He's a dunce.
They all lie. The forgotten story is the lost 22 million emails of Bush relating to his administration. Heavily reported by Newsweek but largely ignored.Giardiasis said:
I don't say that to defend Hillary just to point out the hypocrisy of the republicans.
Agree. What I like about trump is that both the republican and democrat hierarchies hate him.Sintiger said:
Giardiasis said:
He has effectively trolled the Republicans. He has no business being a "Party" candidate. He is a Party of One. The GOP self-destructed in slow motion. He should have been forced to run as the independent he truly is. His candidacy would have petered out in its infancy as he would have had to fund it himself.
Seems to be genuine fear of a Trump victory in the Murdoch press. Fear of the establishment losing its influence because he doesn't need their money. For better or worse, bring it on.
E
easy_tiger
Guest
LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Rupert should run a headline ...
"Um, we didnt mean THAT xenophobic, populist and loose"
After Trump took a huge lead, Clinton has kicked back and is leading by 1 vote.
Carn' the Clints! ;D
Carn' the Clints! ;D
KnightersRevenge said:
yep, the GOP lose either way, that's the hilarious thing.
as much as I think trump is a flog and I don't want him to win, I admit I do have some grudging respect for the way he's gone about things (ie. the anti-establishment stuff).
Giardiasis said:
they're not the only ones who hate him. many, many people with no party allegiance 'hate' him, and with good reason.
There's also a very good reason why the republican and democrat hierarchies love Clinton.Brodders17 said:
Shooting already happened near California's polling booth. Bound to happen in that crazy country.
Giardiasis said:
im not sure the republican hierarchy love Clinton.
and perhaps why many more people 'love' Clinton than otherwise would is because she doesnt call a nation of people rapists, she doesnt brag about sexually assaulting people, she doesnt abuse parents of deceased soldiers, she doesnt promote violence against opponents. i could go on.
i dont particularly care if Clinton becomes Prez, except if she isnt it means an abusive racist bully is. and that cant be a good thing.
