I watched 15 minutes - seems a reasonable logic as to why the senior person shouldn't have got a medal - but I guess we don't really get to hear their side of the story - or more importantly the logic of those who gave the award and how they view the criteria. the creator of the video presents their logic as factual/indisputable. We do hear a senator ask the recipient why he think he meets the criteria, and the recipient not answer the question and ask the senator to follow the process/protocol to do this.
Anyway, it got pretty boring / comments are closed on the video and we don't know the motivation of the maker of the video. Maybe they had an award docked and felt it was hypocritical - there is a little bit where the senator pushes that line.
I'm not sure of the relevance of the video to BRS.
Certain people in power having egos isn't breaking news.
According to Tiga he's the one seeking SAS "scalps". Of course Tiga's never been able to explain why 20 SAS ex-soldiers are lying about BRS and BRS is telling the truth. They are all SAS.