Like they say in the classics, if you throw enough darts at a dartboard you'll eventually get a bullseye!!
She talks *smile*, doesn't listen to opinions other than her own and argues for the sake of it most of the time. Time she was moved on
Much like yourself there KK.She talks *smile*, doesn't listen to opinions other than her own and argues for the sake of it most of the time. Time she was moved on
Just think for a moment. She had the info about a meeting, where she said people at it left with the impression that Mitchell would prefer be coach next year.What scoop? Anyone who thought Clarko would coach hawks next year is a fool. Leaving now is not surprising, what was the point of staying? They aren’t in contention so it means nothing from a premiership point of view. And the Hawks haven’t been relevant for 5 years as a powerhouse club. The big scoop would be naming who is going to coach. Or breaking the initial story. Clarko and hawks are basically irrelevant. The Pies fiasco a much bigger story for mine.
Just think for a moment. She had the info about a meeting, where she said people at it left with the impression that Mitchell would prefer be coach next year.
Mitchell comes out and talks about not saying anything like that IN THAT MEETING. If she was making stuff up, he would have said, that meeting didn't happen. But it did. She found out. How?
Throwing darts at a dart board? No, because someone in the room told her or someone in the room told someone close to them, what was said. If clarko wasn't in the meeting (which also wasn't denied) who else might have been, and what benefit would they get from the story leaking?
Perhaps, someone hoping Clarko would take the hint and go?
The reason she's good, apart from the detailed sources, is how she constructs the story. Too many people make assumptions about what she's saying. The words used are very deliberate. Then when their assumed understanding mis-aligns with what she actually said, she's made stuff up etc.
Too many people make assumptions about what she's saying. The words used are very deliberate. Then when their assumed understanding mis-aligns with what she actually said, she's made stuff up etc.
I agree she was digging but not in the right spot.What scoop? Anyone who thought Clarko would coach hawks next year is a fool. Leaving now is not surprising, what was the point of staying? They aren’t in contention so it means nothing from a premiership point of view. And the Hawks haven’t been relevant for 5 years as a powerhouse club. The big scoop would be naming who is going to coach. Or breaking the initial story. Clarko and hawks are basically irrelevant. The Pies fiasco a much bigger story for mine.
Ty VickerySince 2015 what kids has Clarkson brought through that look like A Graders?
I can't think of one.
Good coach but not in developing kids.
Watson along with every other bombers supporters despise her because of the way she reported the drugs saga. By the end of the saga they had her dishing out the injections in a backyard injecting room personally. They loathe the way she went after Hird.Yeah, and that often happens because she's not scared to go at anyone. Watson hates her so anyone that listens to SEN in the mornings will always get a negative angle on her stories. Brayshaw hates her. Eddie hates anyone the has a go at him or his Pies.
You’re a funny *smile*Much like yourself there KK.
Correct, he intimidates everyone on any program he's on. It's probably his reason for inserting himself into FC. Caro hasn't had much to say about Collingwood.Eddie hates anyone the has a go at him or his Pies.
Has been a great coach. Is he still? Jury's out.Is Clarkson the best ever?, the plastic media want you to believe he is.
Hardwick is 100 times better. Compare what Hardwick started with in 2010, Nason and Nahas and Agus Graham to Clarkson Hodge, Mitchell, Roughhead, Franklin and Lekkas.Has been a great coach. Is he still? Jury's out.
It's certainly arguable, 3/12 years v 4/17. But they both started from a low base.Hardwick is better compare what Hardwick had in 2010 Nason and Nahas and Agus Graham to Clarkson Hodge, Mitchell, Roughhead, Franklin and Lekkas
First time I have ever heard anyone claim Hawks were on the juice. Scratching my head.It's certainly arguable, 3/12 years v 4/17. But they both started from a low base.
Clarkson maybe ahead thanks to winning prematurely in his fourth year. But like a few premiership teams of that era, plenty of Hawks were on the chemicals. You just can't discuss it.
Clarkson years 9/10/11, Hardwick 8/10/11. Hope Hardwick's next five years don't follow suit.
Purely depends on list management L2R2R.Hope Hardwick's next five years don't follow suit.