Bit of a joke. He’d earn more in the media than his playing wage this year.Jack looked like he was there for the pay packet on Saturday. Could be that he only wanted a run. Could be that the oppo are now better than him.
Bit of a joke. He’d earn more in the media than his playing wage this year.Jack looked like he was there for the pay packet on Saturday. Could be that he only wanted a run. Could be that the oppo are now better than him.
Averaged 0.5 marks per game inside the forward 50 which, for a ruckman is considered above average.
We all recognise Nank drifts forward. To that end, his career game average is 0.3 goals per game. Stanley’s career game average is twice that at 0.6 goals per game. And with half the talent.Did you just refute my refute?
That's a pretty narrow stat with a small spread, the high man is 1.3 a game, even the great forward powerhouse Ivan Soldo goes at .7.
By my calculations Stanley took over 5 times the marks in other places than he took inside forward 50.
We all recognise Nank drifts forward. To that end, his career game average is 0.3 goals per game. Stanley’s career game average is twice that at 0.6 goals per game. And with half the talent.
So, Stanley goes forward.
I told you: 0.5 last year is above average.You're talking career now, Stanley has played forward a lot during his career.
But last year he almost always took the bounce and then went back, playing basically as a centre half back. Blicavs went on the ball as an extra midfielder who could ruck and Hawkins took the ruck work forward. It was the most successful tactical shift of any team all season and a big reason Geelong won the flag. Melbourne were having a play with trying to replicate it at times on Sunday with Grundy and Gawn.
I told you: 0.5 last year is above average.
Who cares. That’s above average for ruckmen last year according to the AFL ….and I trust the AFL.With a total of 6 games with marks inside 50.
Who cares. That’s above average for ruckmen last year according to the AFL ….and I trust the AFL.
The topic and number is about ruckmen. And where ruckmen are concerned the number is VERY simple and articulates that Stanley was above average. Your contrary belief has no foundation and neither does your misguided non- trust in the AFL.We all love the AFL, you're just reading the stat wrong.
If Dylan Grimes drifts forward for one quarter against Hawthorn this year and kicks 5, he finishes above average in goals for a defender, it doesn't mean he spent the year pushing forward.
Why would the AFL make this up ? Bizarre this whole disdain of yours for the AFL’s very clear and logical assessment.
Champion Data. Contracted by the AFL. Published by the AFL as the OFFICIAL STATS PROVIDER !It's actually champion data, but I'll take that as agreement that Stanley did not infect, 'push forward last season.'.
Glad we could clear that up.![]()
Champion Data. Contracted by the AFL. Published by the AFL as the OFFICIAL STATS PROVIDER !
Now again, if you don’t trust the AFL’s stats and classifications and refuse to accept them, then we can all only consider that you have some completely unfounded bias towards the AFL.
”Hello ? Mr Nobet Pays from PRE ? It’s Ryan Sampson here and I’m just calling up about your membership this year. Seems your credit card has been declined.”
….and I trust the AFL.
So what your saying is that you know that wasn't the real Jack on the weekend.Not disrespectful at all.
Did you think he played well on Saturday? His performance had nothing to do with his past and whether he bleeds yellow and black. That is undisputed. It was an observation on what he provided to the team on the day.
Let me put it this way, if he didn’t play on Saturday he would not have been missed. That was his level and involvement in the game.
Hopefully come round 1 we see the real Jack.
Thats like comparing Dangerflog too Dusty.Who is more advanced?
Sam Darcy or Samson Ryan?
The former is being touted as someone who should/could play 22 games this year. This is in a forward line comprising of Naughton and Lobb.
Is it purely based on talent or where they were drafted?
Samson Ryan - 206cm 103kgs
Sam Darcy - 208cm 97kgs